PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 10.71%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
1.80%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.71%

VONG

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
2.86%
6M
1.69%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
18.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
10.95%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
2.86%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and VONG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.66

The correlation between IVOV and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOV vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
VONG

Financial Services

21.9%
5.3%

Industrials

18.8%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
13.2%

Real Estate

9.6%
0.4%

Technology

9.2%
51.4%

Energy

7.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

6.0%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
2.7%

Utilities

4.2%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.5%
7.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
13.2%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.9%
VONG
5.3%

Industrials

IVOV
18.8%
VONG
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.5%
VONG
13.2%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.6%
VONG
0.4%

Technology

IVOV
9.2%
VONG
51.4%

Energy

IVOV
7.4%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.0%
VONG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
5.5%
VONG
2.7%

Utilities

IVOV
4.2%
VONG
0.3%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.5%
VONG
7.1%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
VONG
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.20

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

3.96

+3.00

IVOV vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-32.72%

-13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-16.23%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-23.27%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-32.72%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-32.72%

-13.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.62%

+5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-4.88%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.90%

-1.83%

Volatility

IVOV vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 4.08%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.37%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

12.35%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

15.87%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

21.40%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

20.91%

+0.82%

IVOV vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and VONG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to IVOV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.24% vs 10.71% for IVOV. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.24% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.06% for VONG.

IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer