PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 9.50% return.


IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%

VFVA

1D
-1.33%
1M
0.94%
YTD
9.50%
6M
10.40%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-10.07%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
9.50%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-15.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and VFVA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.95

The correlation between IVOV and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
VFVA

Financial Services

21.9%
25.7%

Industrials

18.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
13.1%

Real Estate

9.6%
0.4%

Technology

9.2%
14.5%

Energy

7.4%
7.3%

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.1%

Utilities

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.5%
14.9%

Communication Services

0.5%
6.2%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.9%
VFVA
25.7%

Industrials

IVOV
18.8%
VFVA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.5%
VFVA
13.1%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.6%
VFVA
0.4%

Technology

IVOV
9.2%
VFVA
14.5%

Energy

IVOV
7.4%
VFVA
7.3%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.0%
VFVA
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
5.5%
VFVA
7.1%

Utilities

IVOV
4.2%
VFVA

-

Healthcare

IVOV
3.5%
VFVA
14.9%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
VFVA
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOVVFVADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.87

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.76

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.35

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

10.61

-3.81

IVOV vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOVVFVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.87

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.43

+0.15

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-48.58%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-8.55%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-24.07%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-24.07%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-1.51%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-7.31%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.69%

+0.38%

Volatility

IVOV vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) at 3.36%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.36%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

9.81%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

15.35%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

20.18%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

24.32%

-2.59%

IVOV vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than VFVA's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.95%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IVOV and VFVA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 9.48% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.

Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer