IVOV vs. VFVA
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard. IVOV is passively managed, while VFVA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOV returned 7.51%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for VFVA. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFVA.
Performance
IVOV vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 9.50% return.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
VFVA
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -10.07% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 9.50% | 14.77% | 7.67% | 17.37% | -3.96% | 36.94% | 2.28% | 25.42% | -15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and VFVA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IVOV and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
VFVA
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
VFVA
Industrials
IVOV
VFVA
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
VFVA
Real Estate
IVOV
VFVA
Technology
IVOV
VFVA
Energy
IVOV
VFVA
Basic Materials
IVOV
VFVA
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
VFVA
Utilities
IVOV
VFVA
-
Healthcare
IVOV
VFVA
Communication Services
IVOV
VFVA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
VFVA
IVOV vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.87 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.76 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.35 | -1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 10.61 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.87 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VFVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -48.58% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -8.55% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -24.07% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -24.07% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -1.51% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -7.31% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.69% | +0.38% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) at 3.36%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.36% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 9.81% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 15.35% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 20.18% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 24.32% | -2.59% |
IVOV vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than VFVA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.95% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IVOV and VFVA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VFVA's -48.58%.
On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 9.48% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.
VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.
Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.13% for VFVA.
VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and VFVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer