PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. IJK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. IJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than IJK's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed IJK with an annualized return of 10.71%, while IJK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
1.80%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.71%

IJK

1D
2.99%
1M
2.01%
YTD
18.08%
6M
15.02%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. IJK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
10.95%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
18.08%7.28%15.68%17.41%-19.03%18.68%22.45%25.96%-10.53%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and IJK is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.86

The correlation between IVOV and IJK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. IJK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
IJK

Financial Services

21.9%
7.3%

Industrials

18.8%
31.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
7.9%

Real Estate

9.6%
5.5%

Technology

9.2%
21.8%

Energy

7.4%
3.7%

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
2.1%

Utilities

4.2%
2.0%

Healthcare

3.5%
13.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
1.5%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.9%
IJK
7.3%

Industrials

IVOV
18.8%
IJK
31.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.5%
IJK
7.9%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.6%
IJK
5.5%

Technology

IVOV
9.2%
IJK
21.8%

Energy

IVOV
7.4%
IJK
3.7%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.0%
IJK
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
5.5%
IJK
2.1%

Utilities

IVOV
4.2%
IJK
2.0%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.5%
IJK
13.5%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
IJK
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. IJK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IJK
IJK Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. IJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVIJKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.92

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

11.46

-4.49

IVOV vs. IJK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the IJK Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and IJK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. IJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum IJK drawdown of -54.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and IJK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVIJKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-54.47%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-9.92%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-25.63%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-29.24%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-39.25%

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.12%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-10.79%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.53%

+0.54%

Volatility

IVOV vs. IJK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 4.08%, while iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVIJKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

6.04%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

13.88%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

17.57%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

20.78%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.10%

+0.63%

IVOV vs. IJK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IJK's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. IJK - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than IJK's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJK
iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth ETF
0.55%0.66%0.79%1.13%1.08%0.50%0.70%1.09%1.13%0.93%1.15%1.12%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and IJK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJK has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to IVOV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs IJK's -54.47%.

On 10-year performance, IJK leads with 11.62% vs 10.71% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJK has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for IJK.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.55% for IJK.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IJK is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IJK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.17% for IJK.

IJK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and IJK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer