IVOV vs. DXUV
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. IVOV is passively managed, while DXUV is actively managed. Over the past year, IVOV returned 20.80% vs 27.35% for DXUV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXUV.
Performance
IVOV vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than DXUV's 10.92% return.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
DXUV
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 6.59% |
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 10.92% | 14.34% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and DXUV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IVOV and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. DXUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
DXUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
DXUV
Industrials
IVOV
DXUV
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
DXUV
Real Estate
IVOV
DXUV
Technology
IVOV
DXUV
Energy
IVOV
DXUV
Basic Materials
IVOV
DXUV
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
DXUV
Utilities
IVOV
DXUV
Healthcare
IVOV
DXUV
Communication Services
IVOV
DXUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
DXUV
IVOV vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.17 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 3.04 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.22 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 13.10 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.17 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.05 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than DXUV's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and DXUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -21.08% | -24.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -8.53% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.66% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -3.08% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.09% | +0.98% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 2.98%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 2.98% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 8.99% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 12.72% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 17.31% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 17.31% | +4.42% |
IVOV vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and DXUV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to DXUV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs DXUV's -21.08%.
On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.35% vs 20.80% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DXUV.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.25% for DXUV.
DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and DXUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer