IVOV vs. COWZ
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while COWZ tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOV returned 7.51%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for COWZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
IVOV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.18% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and COWZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IVOV and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
COWZ
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
COWZ
-
Industrials
IVOV
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
COWZ
Real Estate
IVOV
COWZ
-
Technology
IVOV
COWZ
Energy
IVOV
COWZ
Basic Materials
IVOV
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
COWZ
Utilities
IVOV
COWZ
-
Healthcare
IVOV
COWZ
Communication Services
IVOV
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
COWZ
IVOV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 2.02 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.98 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 4.46 | -2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 12.19 | -5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.02 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.65 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -38.63% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -5.00% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -22.00% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -22.00% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.91% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -4.81% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.83% | +1.24% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 2.56% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 7.12% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 11.13% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 17.63% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 19.93% | +1.80% |
IVOV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and COWZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.
IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer