PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.


IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and COWZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.87

The correlation between IVOV and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
COWZ

Financial Services

21.9%

-

Industrials

18.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
11.7%

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Technology

9.2%
16.0%

Energy

7.4%
16.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
10.9%

Utilities

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.5%
21.8%

Communication Services

0.5%
10.4%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.9%
COWZ

-

Industrials

IVOV
18.8%
COWZ
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.5%
COWZ
11.7%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.6%
COWZ

-

Technology

IVOV
9.2%
COWZ
16.0%

Energy

IVOV
7.4%
COWZ
16.9%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.0%
COWZ
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
5.5%
COWZ
10.9%

Utilities

IVOV
4.2%
COWZ

-

Healthcare

IVOV
3.5%
COWZ
21.8%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
COWZ
10.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOVCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.02

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.98

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

4.46

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

12.19

-5.39

IVOV vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOVCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.02

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.60

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.65

-0.07

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-38.63%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-5.00%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-22.00%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-22.00%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.91%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-4.81%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.83%

+1.24%

Volatility

IVOV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

2.56%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

7.12%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

11.13%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

17.63%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

19.93%

+1.80%

IVOV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVOV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and COWZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.

IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer