IVOV vs. CCFE
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and CCFE (Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. IVOV is passively managed, while CCFE is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CCFE.
Performance
IVOV vs. CCFE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than CCFE's 4.22% return.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
CCFE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV vs. CCFE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 9.36% |
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF | 4.22% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and CCFE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. CCFE — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
CCFE
IVOV vs. CCFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | CCFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | CCFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. CCFE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than CCFE's maximum drawdown of -21.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and CCFE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | CCFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -21.15% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -12.92% | +12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -6.44% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
IVOV vs. CCFE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | CCFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 24.40% | -9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 24.40% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 24.40% | -2.67% |
IVOV vs. CCFE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CCFE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOV vs. CCFE - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than CCFE's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCFE Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and CCFE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CCFE.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.02% for CCFE.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Concourse Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.95% for CCFE.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and CCFE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer