PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 10.45%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
1.08%
1M
1.18%
YTD
9.30%
6M
10.66%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
10.45%

BNO

1D
0.76%
1M
-7.65%
YTD
86.76%
6M
83.45%
1Y
89.50%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
9.30%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
86.76%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and BNO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.26

The correlation between IVOV and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOVBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.17

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.68

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

5.39

-3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.24

10.23

-2.99

IVOV vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOVBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.17

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.68

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.14

+0.44

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-87.06%

+41.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-17.87%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-23.75%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-33.70%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-75.18%

+29.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-12.04%

+12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-40.18%

+34.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

9.43%

-6.36%

Volatility

IVOV vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 4.19%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

15.03%

-10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

36.08%

-25.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

41.56%

-26.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

35.37%

-15.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

36.68%

-14.95%

IVOV vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVOV vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and BNO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to IVOV (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.38% vs 10.45% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer