IVOO vs. VT
IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.59%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
IVOO vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.59%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.
IVOO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
IVOO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.65% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and VT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IVOO and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOO vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOO
VT
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IVOO
VT
Technology
IVOO
VT
Financial Services
IVOO
VT
Consumer Cyclical
IVOO
VT
Healthcare
IVOO
VT
Real Estate
IVOO
VT
Energy
IVOO
VT
Basic Materials
IVOO
VT
Consumer Defensive
IVOO
VT
Utilities
IVOO
VT
Communication Services
IVOO
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
VT
IVOO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.67 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.47 | 11.57 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -50.27% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -9.67% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.22% | -16.51% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -26.38% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -34.24% | -8.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.80% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -7.00% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.23% | +0.18% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) is 4.73%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that IVOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 5.65% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 11.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 13.58% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 16.19% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 17.20% | +3.99% |
IVOO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOO and VT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to IVOO (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.96% vs 11.59% for IVOO. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IVOO.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.
IVOO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IVOO and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOO and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer