PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOO vs. QVMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOO vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than QVMM's 15.55% return.


IVOO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.02%
6M
10.08%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
10.98%
ALL TIME*
12.19%

QVMM

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.47%
6M
10.81%
YTD
15.55%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.28M$9.17M$9.84M
$32.54K$29.74K$38.31K

IVOO vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.58%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%6.10%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
15.55%8.82%13.36%15.43%-13.06%6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and QVMM is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.99

The correlation between IVOO and QVMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOO vs. QVMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOO
QVMM

Industrials

25.4%
27.1%

Technology

17.4%
16.1%

Financial Services

13.8%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.8%

Real Estate

7.2%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.6%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.9%

Industrials

IVOO
25.4%
QVMM
27.1%

Technology

IVOO
17.4%
QVMM
16.1%

Financial Services

IVOO
13.8%
QVMM
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOO
10.5%
QVMM
10.4%

Healthcare

IVOO
8.9%
QVMM
7.8%

Real Estate

IVOO
7.2%
QVMM
7.7%

Basic Materials

IVOO
4.8%
QVMM
4.8%

Energy

IVOO
4.6%
QVMM
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVOO
3.2%
QVMM
3.2%

Utilities

IVOO
2.8%
QVMM
2.6%

Communication Services

IVOO
1.5%
QVMM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOO vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QVMM
QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVOO vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOOQVMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.77

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

9.91

-1.19

IVOO vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and QVMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, which is greater than QVMM's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and QVMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOOQVMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-24.00%

-18.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-8.30%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-24.00%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-24.00%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-1.91%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-6.90%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.32%

+0.10%

Volatility

IVOO vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOOQVMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.47%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.53%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

15.47%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

19.34%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

19.32%

+1.83%

IVOO vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOO vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QVMM's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.18%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
QVMM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.15%1.32%1.29%1.42%1.51%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IVOO and QVMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QVMM has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to IVOO (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs QVMM's -24.00%.

On 5-year performance, QVMM leads with 8.56% vs 8.41% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QVMM.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.15% for QVMM.

IVOO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QVMM is Multi-factor. IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IVOO and 0.15% for QVMM.

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOO and QVMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer