PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOO vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOO vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 20.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 11.22%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%

FYC

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.23%
YTD
20.01%
6M
20.96%
1Y
53.40%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOO vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
20.01%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOO and FYC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.87

The correlation between IVOO and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOO vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOO
FYC

Industrials

25.1%
13.4%

Technology

15.7%
13.7%

Financial Services

14.4%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.6%
27.9%

Real Estate

7.5%
8.4%

Energy

5.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.8%

Utilities

3.1%
1.5%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.4%

Industrials

IVOO
25.1%
FYC
13.4%

Technology

IVOO
15.7%
FYC
13.7%

Financial Services

IVOO
14.4%
FYC
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOO
10.7%
FYC
9.9%

Healthcare

IVOO
8.6%
FYC
27.9%

Real Estate

IVOO
7.5%
FYC
8.4%

Energy

IVOO
5.5%
FYC
3.4%

Basic Materials

IVOO
4.8%
FYC
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

IVOO
3.8%
FYC
3.8%

Utilities

IVOO
3.1%
FYC
1.5%

Communication Services

IVOO
1.0%
FYC
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOO vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOO vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOOFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

5.12

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

18.64

-8.02

IVOO vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOO and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOOFYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.55

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.54

+0.08

Drawdowns

IVOO vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOOFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.33%

-47.85%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-10.48%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-27.79%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-35.37%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-47.85%

+5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.83%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-9.66%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.87%

-0.46%

Volatility

IVOO vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) is 4.39%, while First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that IVOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOOFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

5.53%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

14.99%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

21.03%

-5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

23.62%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

24.57%

-3.38%

IVOO vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVOO vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.07%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOO and FYC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYC has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to IVOO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.30% vs 11.22% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.30% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.

IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOO and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOO and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer