IVOO vs. ASH
IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while ASH (Ashland Global Holdings Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.22%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for ASH. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IVOO vs. ASH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than ASH's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has outperformed ASH with an annualized return of 11.22%, while ASH has yielded a comparatively lower 1.87% annualized return.
IVOO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
ASH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- -11.86%
- 5Y*
- -7.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
IVOO vs. ASH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.13% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | -1.48% | -15.40% | -13.71% | -20.24% | 1.14% | 37.67% | 5.05% | 9.42% | 0.90% | 34.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and ASH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IVOO and ASH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. ASH — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
ASH
IVOO vs. ASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOO | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 0.75 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 1.83 | +8.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOO | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 0.47 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | -0.25 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.06 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.24 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. ASH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum ASH drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and ASH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -91.64% | +49.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -24.17% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.22% | -53.26% | +29.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -57.29% | +33.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -57.29% | +14.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -45.69% | +45.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -17.59% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 9.83% | -7.42% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. ASH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) is 4.39%, while Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that IVOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | ASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 9.93% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 28.73% | -17.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 38.19% | -22.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 31.06% | -11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 29.84% | -8.65% |
Dividends
IVOO vs. ASH - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than ASH's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | 2.92% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 1.77% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 1.39% | 1.40% | 1.37% | 88.83% | 1.43% | 1.47% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOO and ASH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASH has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to IVOO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs ASH's -91.64%.
IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOO and ASH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer