PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASH vs. BCPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ASH vs. BCPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASH vs. BCPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
-4.58%-15.40%-13.71%-20.24%1.14%37.67%5.05%9.42%0.90%-33.98%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
10.51%-5.33%10.15%22.80%-27.15%46.90%13.96%30.38%-2.19%-3.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASH:

$2.56B

BCPC:

$5.48B

EPS

ASH:

-$14.72

BCPC:

$4.75

PS Ratio

ASH:

1.42

BCPC:

5.33

PB Ratio

ASH:

1.36

BCPC:

4.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASH:

$1.81B

BCPC:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASH:

$543.00M

BCPC:

$370.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASH:

-$383.00M

BCPC:

$254.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASH achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than BCPC's 10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ASH has underperformed BCPC with an annualized return of -5.07%, while BCPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.


ASH

1D
6.39%
1M
-10.82%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
17.77%
1Y
-3.34%
3Y*
-16.62%
5Y*
-7.53%
10Y*
-5.07%

BCPC

1D
-0.56%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
10.51%
6M
13.64%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASH vs. BCPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASH
ASH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BCPC
BCPC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BCPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASH vs. BCPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASHBCPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

0.12

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

0.36

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.04

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

0.23

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

0.54

-0.77

ASH vs. BCPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASH Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the BCPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASH and BCPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASHBCPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

0.12

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.28

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

0.42

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.35

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ASH and BCPC is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ASH vs. BCPC - Dividend Comparison

ASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than BCPC's 0.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
2.99%2.81%2.24%1.77%1.21%1.09%1.39%1.40%1.37%1.50%1.43%1.47%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
0.57%0.63%0.53%0.80%0.58%0.38%0.50%0.51%0.60%0.52%0.45%0.56%

Drawdowns

ASH vs. BCPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASH drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than BCPC's maximum drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASH and BCPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHBCPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.64%

-85.26%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-17.69%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.29%

-33.89%

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.54%

-36.72%

-30.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.56%

-7.52%

-42.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-22.53%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

7.68%

+4.54%

Volatility

ASH vs. BCPC - Volatility Comparison

Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to Balchem Corporation (BCPC) at 6.10%. This indicates that ASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASHBCPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

6.10%

+7.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.03%

15.62%

+10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.11%

22.33%

+17.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.20%

24.08%

+6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.92%

26.89%

+6.03%

Financials

ASH vs. BCPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashland Global Holdings Inc. and Balchem Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
386.00M
263.62M
(ASH) Total Revenue
(BCPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ASH vs. BCPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ashland Global Holdings Inc. and Balchem Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
27.2%
35.6%
Portfolio components
ASH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.00M and revenue of 386.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

BCPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 93.90M and revenue of 263.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

ASH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of -14.00M and revenue of 386.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.6%.

BCPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 52.29M and revenue of 263.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

ASH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ashland Global Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 2.00M and revenue of 386.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.

BCPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 39.23M and revenue of 263.62M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.