PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ASH vs. BCPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ASHBCPC
YTD Return14.08%-1.66%
1Y Return8.03%12.85%
3Y Return (Ann)4.84%4.52%
5Y Return (Ann)6.29%7.94%
10Y Return (Ann)8.30%9.72%
Sharpe Ratio-0.090.55
Daily Std Dev28.30%23.57%
Max Drawdown-91.64%-85.24%
Current Drawdown-13.86%-13.68%

Fundamentals


ASHBCPC
Market Cap$4.81B$4.49B
EPS$2.91$3.36
PE Ratio33.0141.45
PEG Ratio-1.364.46
Revenue (TTM)$2.14B$922.44M
Gross Profit (TTM)$668.00M$280.45M
EBITDA (TTM)$375.00M$211.52M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between ASH and BCPC is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ASH vs. BCPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ASH achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than BCPC's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ASH has underperformed BCPC with an annualized return of 8.30%, while BCPC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20,000.00%40,000.00%60,000.00%80,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,109.84%
70,737.77%
ASH
BCPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ashland Global Holdings Inc.

Balchem Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASH vs. BCPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASH, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASH, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASH, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.01
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASH, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASH, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.27
BCPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BCPC, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.70

ASH vs. BCPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASH Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the BCPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ASH and BCPC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.09
0.55
ASH
BCPC

Dividends

ASH vs. BCPC - Dividend Comparison

ASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than BCPC's 0.81% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ASH
Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
1.61%1.77%1.21%1.09%1.39%1.40%1.37%1.22%1.43%1.47%1.14%1.28%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
0.81%0.80%0.58%0.38%0.50%0.51%0.60%0.52%0.45%0.56%0.45%0.44%

Drawdowns

ASH vs. BCPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASH drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than BCPC's maximum drawdown of -85.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASH and BCPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.86%
-13.68%
ASH
BCPC

Volatility

ASH vs. BCPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) is 5.76%, while Balchem Corporation (BCPC) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that ASH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.76%
6.33%
ASH
BCPC

Financials

ASH vs. BCPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashland Global Holdings Inc. and Balchem Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items