ASH vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASH or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between ASH and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASH vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASH:
-0.49
COST:
2.60
ASH:
-0.57
COST:
3.20
ASH:
0.92
COST:
1.46
ASH:
-0.40
COST:
4.72
ASH:
-1.17
COST:
12.17
ASH:
11.67%
COST:
3.98%
ASH:
28.05%
COST:
18.66%
ASH:
-91.64%
COST:
-53.39%
ASH:
-34.49%
COST:
-4.08%
Fundamentals
ASH:
$3.45B
COST:
$435.99B
ASH:
$3.95
COST:
$16.98
ASH:
18.50
COST:
57.84
ASH:
-1.36
COST:
5.99
ASH:
$2.49B
COST:
$258.81B
ASH:
$518.00M
COST:
$32.80B
ASH:
$350.00M
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASH achieves a -13.24% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ASH has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 3.52%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.
ASH
-13.24%
-5.23%
-25.10%
-14.20%
0.28%
3.52%
COST
45.38%
2.80%
12.78%
47.55%
28.68%
23.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASH vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASH vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
ASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than COST's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASH Ashland Global Holdings Inc. | 2.23% | 1.77% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 1.39% | 1.40% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 1.14% | 1.28% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.04% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
ASH vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASH drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASH and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASH vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (ASH) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that ASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ASH vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashland Global Holdings Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities