PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVAL vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVAL vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 8.01%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.


IVAL

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.49%
YTD
13.29%
6M
16.64%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
8.01%

IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVAL vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
13.29%34.92%-0.71%20.61%-10.06%-0.22%-4.94%21.26%-22.50%31.03%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and IPOS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.46

The correlation between IVAL and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVAL vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVAL
IPOS

Industrials

28.5%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

23.5%
7.1%

Basic Materials

21.2%
5.3%

Energy

11.6%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.7%

Technology

3.9%
42.0%

Communication Services

2.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

1.8%
16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.1%

Industrials

IVAL
28.5%
IPOS
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVAL
23.5%
IPOS
7.1%

Basic Materials

IVAL
21.2%
IPOS
5.3%

Energy

IVAL
11.6%
IPOS
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVAL
7.4%
IPOS
4.7%

Technology

IVAL
3.9%
IPOS
42.0%

Communication Services

IVAL
2.1%
IPOS
0.3%

Healthcare

IVAL
1.8%
IPOS
16.2%

Financial Services

IVAL

-

IPOS
9.6%

Real Estate

IVAL

-

IPOS

-

Utilities

IVAL

-

IPOS
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVAL vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVAL vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVALIPOSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.24

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

2.76

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.83

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.17

11.58

-1.41

IVAL vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVALIPOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.24

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.28

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.12

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.09

+0.25

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVALIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-73.09%

+27.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-17.17%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-34.08%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-69.93%

+38.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

-73.09%

+27.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-40.44%

+37.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-31.99%

+19.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

5.67%

-2.49%

Volatility

IVAL vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) is 3.82%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that IVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVALIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

12.05%

-8.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

26.45%

-14.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

29.41%

-14.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

27.19%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

24.13%

-5.29%

IVAL vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVAL vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.66%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVAL and IPOS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to IVAL (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, IVAL leads with 8.01% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, IVAL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVAL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVAL and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer