IVAL vs. IPAC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while IPAC is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. IVAL is actively managed, while IPAC is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVAL returned 8.07%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for IPAC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IPAC.

Performance

IVAL vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with IVAL at 13.85% and IPAC at 13.85%. Over the past 10 years, IVAL has underperformed IPAC with an annualized return of 8.07%, while IPAC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.14% annualized return.

IVAL

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 6M: 17.68%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

IPAC

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 9.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVAL vs. IPAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	13.85%	34.92%	-0.71%	20.61%	-10.06%	-0.22%	-4.94%	21.26%	-22.50%	31.03%
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	13.85%	25.16%	6.18%	14.51%	-13.68%	3.09%	12.39%	19.44%	-12.78%	25.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and IPAC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014	0.82

The correlation between IVAL and IPAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. IPAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVAL	IPAC
Industrials	28.5%	21.3%
Consumer Cyclical	23.5%	10.8%
Basic Materials	21.2%	8.2%
Energy	11.6%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	4.0%
Technology	3.9%	12.9%
Communication Services	2.1%	5.7%
Healthcare	1.8%	5.3%
Financial Services	-	22.9%
Real Estate	-	5.5%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

IVAL vs. IPAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVAL

IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 59
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 58

IPAC

IPAC Risk / Return Rank: 49
IPAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IPAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IPAC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IPAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
IPAC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVAL vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVAL	IPAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.67	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.39	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.53	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	9.12	+1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVAL vs. IPAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the IPAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and IPAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVAL	IPAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	1.67	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.48	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.55	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.45	-0.10

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than IPAC's maximum drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and IPAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVAL	IPAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.09%	-30.99%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.24%	-11.49%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-15.45%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	-29.64%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.09%	-30.99%	-15.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-0.45%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.00%	-7.49%	-4.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.18%	0.00%

Volatility

IVAL vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) have volatilities of 3.96% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVAL	IPAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	4.05%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	13.11%	-1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	16.46%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	16.63%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	16.59%	+2.25%

IVAL vs. IPAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAC's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVAL vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than IPAC's 3.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	3.80%	4.32%	3.43%	3.16%	2.76%	4.03%	1.68%	3.37%	2.95%	2.98%	2.66%	2.60%
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	2.64%	2.75%	3.60%	5.15%	8.00%	3.95%	2.07%	2.51%	2.93%	1.73%	2.02%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVAL and IPAC in my portfolio?

IVAL and IPAC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVAL or IPAC?

IPAC has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to IVAL (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs IPAC's -30.99%.

Which ETF is better, IVAL or IPAC?

On 10-year performance, IPAC leads with 9.14% vs 8.07% for IVAL. On fees, IPAC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVAL or IPAC?

Over the 10-year period, IPAC has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVAL or IPAC?

IPAC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVAL or IPAC?

IPAC has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 2.64% for IVAL.

What is the main difference between IVAL and IPAC?

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IPAC is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.09% for IPAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.