IUSV vs. PSQ
IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 11.73%/yr vs -18.71%/yr for PSQ. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PSQ.
Performance
IUSV vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of 11.73%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -18.71% annualized return.
IUSV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
PSQ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 1Y
- -19.78%
- 3Y*
- -16.20%
- 5Y*
- -12.44%
- 10Y*
- -18.71%
IUSV vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 9.97% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -12.96% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSV and PSQ is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.72 |
The correlation between IUSV and PSQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (all time) to -0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSV vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSV
PSQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
IUSV
PSQ
-
Financial Services
IUSV
PSQ
Consumer Cyclical
IUSV
PSQ
-
Healthcare
IUSV
PSQ
-
Industrials
IUSV
PSQ
-
Consumer Defensive
IUSV
PSQ
-
Energy
IUSV
PSQ
-
Utilities
IUSV
PSQ
-
Real Estate
IUSV
PSQ
-
Basic Materials
IUSV
PSQ
-
Communication Services
IUSV
PSQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSV vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
IUSV
PSQ
IUSV vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSV | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.83 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | -0.80 | +3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | -1.67 | +12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSV vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSV | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -98.26% | +41.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | -24.83% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -49.65% | +31.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.95% | -60.91% | +42.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -87.94% | +50.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -98.18% | +98.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -74.08% | +67.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 11.88% | -10.21% |
Volatility
IUSV vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.58%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSV | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 8.62% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 15.32% | -8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 18.59% | -8.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 22.82% | -8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 22.40% | -5.42% |
IUSV vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSV vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than PSQ's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.40% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSV and PSQ have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to IUSV (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 11.73% vs -18.71% for PSQ. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 11.73% return vs -18.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.67% for IUSV.
IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.95% for PSQ.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSV and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer