PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 11.91%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.


IUSV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
11.49%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$60.14M$63.62M$70.42M

IUSV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
10.38%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and FDL is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSV and FDL has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSV
FDL

Technology

20.4%
4.3%

Financial Services

16.1%
13.7%

Healthcare

11.9%
11.7%

Industrials

11.2%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
24.3%

Energy

7.3%
11.1%

Utilities

4.4%
15.4%

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
11.2%

Technology

IUSV
20.4%
FDL
4.3%

Financial Services

IUSV
16.1%
FDL
13.7%

Healthcare

IUSV
11.9%
FDL
11.7%

Industrials

IUSV
11.2%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSV
10.0%
FDL
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

IUSV
8.5%
FDL
24.3%

Energy

IUSV
7.3%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

IUSV
4.4%
FDL
15.4%

Real Estate

IUSV
3.8%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

IUSV
3.6%
FDL
0.4%

Communication Services

IUSV
2.7%
FDL
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

6.29

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

14.86

-2.70

IUSV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-65.93%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-4.27%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-12.24%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-16.46%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-41.40%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.96%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-9.59%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.81%

-0.17%

Volatility

IUSV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.67%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

4.96%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.97%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

11.95%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.44%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

17.16%

-0.17%

IUSV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.66%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSV and FDL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to IUSV (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 11.91% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.66% for IUSV.

IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer