PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 17.63%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.02% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
10.18%
6M
11.00%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
17.63%

VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
1.00%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
10.18%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and VTI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.94

The correlation between IUSG and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
VTI

Technology

50.5%
33.3%

Communication Services

15.7%
10.1%

Financial Services

8.6%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.8%

Industrials

6.5%
9.5%

Healthcare

6.4%
9.1%

Utilities

1.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.0%

Energy

0.3%
3.8%

Technology

IUSG
50.5%
VTI
33.3%

Communication Services

IUSG
15.7%
VTI
10.1%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.6%
VTI
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
8.4%
VTI
9.8%

Industrials

IUSG
6.5%
VTI
9.5%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.4%
VTI
9.1%

Utilities

IUSG
1.1%
VTI
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.1%
VTI
4.7%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.8%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
VTI
2.0%

Energy

IUSG
0.3%
VTI
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.79

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

12.52

-3.72

IUSG vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-55.45%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-8.92%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-19.30%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-25.36%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-35.00%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-2.14%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-8.02%

-13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

1.99%

+1.17%

Volatility

IUSG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.50%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

4.50%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

9.82%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

12.64%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

17.47%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

18.33%

+2.13%

IUSG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VTI's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IUSG and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.63% vs 15.02% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 15.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer