IUSG vs. RPG
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSG returned 17.77%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
IUSG vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed RPG with an annualized return of 17.77%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.14% annualized return.
IUSG
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
IUSG vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 9.19% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and RPG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IUSG and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUSG vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSG
RPG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IUSG
RPG
Communication Services
IUSG
RPG
Financial Services
IUSG
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
IUSG
RPG
Industrials
IUSG
RPG
Healthcare
IUSG
RPG
Consumer Defensive
IUSG
RPG
Utilities
IUSG
RPG
Real Estate
IUSG
RPG
Basic Materials
IUSG
RPG
Energy
IUSG
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
RPG
IUSG vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSG | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.49 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 13.16 | -4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than RPG's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -53.27% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -11.08% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -24.75% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | -35.59% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | -36.58% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -4.60% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -8.83% | -12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.93% | +0.27% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 7.16%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 11.10% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 19.02% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 22.09% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 23.86% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.90% | -2.42% |
IUSG vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUSG vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSG and RPG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to IUSG (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.77% vs 15.14% for RPG. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.35% for RPG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer