PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUSG vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUSG vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Growth Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSG returned 17.88%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

IUSG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed BNO with an annualized return of 17.88%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.60% annualized return.

IUSG

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
13.91%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
17.88%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF		14.08%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and BNO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.21

The correlation between IUSG and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with IUSG:
IUSG vs. IUSVIUSG vs. SCHGIUSG vs. VUGIUSG vs. QQQIUSG vs. IVWIUSG vs. IVVIUSG vs. VOOG
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

IUSG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUSGBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.17
2.23

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
2.73

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

5.17

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

9.76

+1.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSG vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUSGBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.23

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.69

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.37

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.14

+0.24

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUSGBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-87.06%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-17.87%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-23.75%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-33.70%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-75.18%

+42.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-10.29%

+9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-40.17%

+18.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

9.45%

-6.39%

Volatility

IUSG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 4.23%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUSGBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

14.22%

-9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

36.10%

-23.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

41.46%

-25.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

35.38%

-14.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

36.68%

-16.28%

IUSG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF		0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUSG and BNO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to IUSG (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.88% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer