PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


IUSG

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
13.91%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
17.88%

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.08%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%15.46%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and BBUS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.96

The correlation between IUSG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
BBUS

Technology

48.0%
37.1%

Communication Services

17.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

8.8%
10.8%

Industrials

7.5%
7.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.2%

Utilities

0.5%
2.6%

Energy

0.2%
3.2%

Technology

IUSG
48.0%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

IUSG
17.1%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
9.3%
BBUS
9.4%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.8%
BBUS
10.8%

Industrials

IUSG
7.5%
BBUS
7.2%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.2%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.0%
BBUS
4.5%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.9%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

IUSG
0.5%
BBUS
2.6%

Energy

IUSG
0.2%
BBUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.00

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

13.76

-2.67

IUSG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSGBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.33

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.79

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.84

-0.45

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-35.35%

-28.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-9.21%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-19.01%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-25.46%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.74%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-5.46%

-15.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.00%

+1.06%

Volatility

IUSG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.88%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

8.96%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

11.87%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

17.03%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

19.59%

+0.81%

IUSG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IUSG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 15.69% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 15.69% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer