PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUSF.L vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUSF.L vs. VOT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IUSF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSF.L is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSF.L returned 7.45%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for VOT. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (IUSF.L) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSF.L is traded in GBp, while VOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSF.L achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 9.59% return.

IUSF.L

1D
0.64%
1M
4.37%
YTD
7.69%
6M
7.96%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
—

VOT

1D
0.69%
1M
4.96%
YTD
9.59%
6M
6.31%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF		7.69%1.00%14.60%10.79%-8.57%27.74%13.62%23.94%-5.85%7.91%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF		9.59%2.83%18.42%16.95%-20.41%21.64%30.55%28.68%0.04%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSF.L and VOT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016

0.56

The correlation between IUSF.L and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUSF.L
VOT

Technology

21.2%
28.9%

Industrials

16.5%
23.7%

Financial Services

12.4%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
13.9%

Healthcare

9.3%
9.3%

Real Estate

7.1%
4.8%

Utilities

6.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
0.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.8%

Energy

2.3%
2.7%

Technology

IUSF.L
21.2%
VOT
28.9%

Industrials

IUSF.L
16.5%
VOT
23.7%

Financial Services

IUSF.L
12.4%
VOT
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSF.L
9.9%
VOT
13.9%

Healthcare

IUSF.L
9.3%
VOT
9.3%

Real Estate

IUSF.L
7.1%
VOT
4.8%

Utilities

IUSF.L
6.3%
VOT
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUSF.L
5.7%
VOT
0.8%

Basic Materials

IUSF.L
5.3%
VOT
1.8%

Communication Services

IUSF.L
3.9%
VOT
3.8%

Energy

IUSF.L
2.3%
VOT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Often compared with IUSF.L:
IUSF.L vs. VTIIUSF.L vs. VUAA.LIUSF.L vs. VOOIUSF.L vs. IJHIUSF.L vs. ^SP500TRIUSF.L vs. VGTIUSF.L vs. CNX1.L
Often compared with VOT:
VOT vs. VOVOT vs. VOEVOT vs. IWPVOT vs. VMGMXVOT vs. IJHVOT vs. IMCGVOT vs. FMDGX

Return for Risk

IUSF.L vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUSF.L
IUSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IUSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (IUSF.L) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUSF.LVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.59
0.88

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.21
1.26

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.16

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.89

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

2.31

+5.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSF.L and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUSF.LVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

0.88

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.41

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.63

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -45.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSF.L and VOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUSF.LVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-45.87%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.39%

-14.98%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.73%

-24.25%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-31.12%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.12%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-7.90%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

5.78%

-3.37%

Volatility

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (IUSF.L) is 2.67%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that IUSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUSF.LVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

4.14%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

11.40%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

15.20%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

19.94%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

20.63%

-3.27%

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUSF.L vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

IUSF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF		0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUSF.L and VOT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSF.L.

IUSF.L is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IUSF.L tracks Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSF.L and 0.05% for VOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSF.L and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer