IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L
IUSF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSF.L is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUSF.L returned 7.45%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for VUAA.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUSF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSF.L is traded in GBp, while VUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSF.L achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 10.76% return.
IUSF.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF | 7.69% | 1.00% | 14.60% | 10.79% | -8.57% | 27.74% | 13.62% | 5.46% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.76% | 9.01% | 27.46% | 20.35% | -8.96% | 30.57% | 14.21% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSF.L and VUAA.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IUSF.L and VUAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Industrials
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Financial Services
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Healthcare
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Real Estate
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Utilities
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Communication Services
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Energy
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUSF.L
VUAA.L
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (IUSF.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSF.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.00 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 13.52 | -6.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSF.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.42 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.97 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.89 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSF.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSF.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -26.15% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -7.23% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.73% | -21.12% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -21.12% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -3.69% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.14% | +0.27% |
Volatility
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Size Factor UCITS ETF (IUSF.L) is 2.67%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that IUSF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSF.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 3.44% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 8.61% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 11.93% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 15.41% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 17.13% | +0.23% |
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSF.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSF.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSF.L and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSF.L.
IUSF.L is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. IUSF.L tracks Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSF.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for IUSF.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer