PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSB vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSB vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSB has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 1.89%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


IUSB

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.89%

VYM

1D
0.11%
1M
0.42%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.13%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSB vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
0.54%7.38%2.11%6.23%-13.04%-1.33%7.62%9.13%-0.27%3.82%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.70%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSB and VYM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.03

Over the past year, IUSB and VYM have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSB vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSB
IUSB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSB vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSBVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.79

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

14.09

-8.56

IUSB vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSB and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSB vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSBVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-56.98%

+39.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-6.69%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.82%

-14.46%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-15.84%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.90%

-35.21%

+17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.12%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-7.18%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.80%

-0.93%

Volatility

IUSB vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) is 1.08%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that IUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSBVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

3.02%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

7.64%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

10.41%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

13.93%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

16.35%

-11.30%

IUSB vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSB vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
4.23%4.17%4.04%3.46%2.53%1.74%2.68%3.04%2.98%2.56%2.60%1.95%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.29%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSB and VYM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to IUSB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSB dropped -17.90% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 1.89% for IUSB. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IUSB.

IUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.

IUSB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VYM is Dividend. IUSB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IUSB and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSB and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer