IUSB vs. IXUS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS).
IUSB and IXUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. IXUS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both IUSB and IXUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IUSB or IXUS.
Correlation
The correlation between IUSB and IXUS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IUSB vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IUSB:
1.26
IXUS:
0.54
IUSB:
1.86
IXUS:
0.83
IUSB:
1.22
IXUS:
1.10
IUSB:
0.53
IXUS:
0.73
IUSB:
3.33
IXUS:
1.79
IUSB:
1.86%
IXUS:
3.99%
IUSB:
4.91%
IXUS:
13.32%
IUSB:
-17.98%
IXUS:
-36.22%
IUSB:
-4.35%
IXUS:
-2.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSB achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than IXUS's 6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSB has underperformed IXUS with an annualized return of 1.74%, while IXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.10% annualized return.
IUSB
2.87%
0.03%
-0.06%
6.29%
0.27%
1.74%
IXUS
6.20%
0.59%
-1.58%
7.59%
12.52%
5.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IUSB vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IXUS's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IUSB vs. IXUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IUSB
IXUS
IUSB vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IUSB vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison
IUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than IXUS's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 4.06% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 3.13% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.40% | 2.58% | 2.81% | 2.95% |
Drawdowns
IUSB vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.98%, smaller than the maximum IXUS drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSB and IXUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IUSB vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) is 1.15%, while iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that IUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.