IUS vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

IUS vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUS achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 7.95% return.

IUS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 13.60%
• 1Y: 29.78%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 6.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	14.47%	4.30%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	7.95%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and GXLC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

IUS vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 91
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUS	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.20	—	—

Drawdowns

IUS vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUS	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.67%	-9.08%	-25.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-3.37%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-1.55%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IUS	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	13.82%	-3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	13.82%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	13.82%	+4.20%

IUS vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUS vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.30%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUS and GXLC in my portfolio?

IUS and GXLC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUS or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUS or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUS or GXLC?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between IUS and GXLC?

IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 0.02% for GXLC.