IUS vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUS returned 13.61%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

IUS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IUS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 33.27%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	15.71%	16.94%	16.51%	20.79%	-8.34%	32.17%	15.09%	29.34%	-12.49%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	19.53%	-5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS and DFND is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between IUS and DFND has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUS vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUS	DFND
Technology	22.4%	24.8%
Communication Services	14.7%	0.8%
Healthcare	12.8%	10.7%
Energy	10.9%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	3.5%
Industrials	9.7%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	4.2%
Financial Services	6.8%	18.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.3%
Utilities	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	2.0%

Return for Risk

IUS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 91
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IUS	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	0.02	+3.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	0.11	+4.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.02	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.44	0.07	+5.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.27	0.13	+23.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUS vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IUS	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26	0.02	+3.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.21	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.36	+0.50

Drawdowns

IUS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS drawdown since its inception was -34.67%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUS	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.67%	-22.65%	-12.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-3.44%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-12.56%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	-22.65%	+3.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-3.69%	+3.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-5.70%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	3.70%	-2.27%

Volatility

IUS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that IUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUS	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	0.00%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.41%	6.16%	+1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	10.92%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	22.46%	-7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	19.09%	-1.05%

IUS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.28%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUS and DFND in my portfolio?

IUS and DFND have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IUS or DFND?

IUS has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUS dropped -34.67% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, IUS or DFND?

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUS or DFND?

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUS or DFND?

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUS or DFND?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between IUS and DFND?

IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IUS and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.