ITW vs. KMB
ITW (Illinois Tool Works Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. ITW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ITW returned 11.44%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KMB. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ITW vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITW achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ITW has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 11.44%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.60% annualized return.
ITW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
KMB
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -23.22%
- 3Y*
- -6.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.60%
ITW vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 3.12% | -0.43% | -0.97% | 21.56% | -8.46% | 23.60% | 16.42% | 45.60% | -22.10% | 38.92% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -0.57% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITW and KMB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
ITW:
$14.33
KMB:
$5.93
ITW:
17.61
KMB:
16.49
ITW:
2.92
KMB:
2.85
ITW:
3.40
KMB:
1.97
ITW:
$16.22B
KMB:
$16.54B
ITW:
$7.16B
KMB:
$5.93B
ITW:
$4.61B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITW vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
ITW
KMB
ITW vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITW | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.79 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | -1.21 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITW | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | -0.91 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | -0.09 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.03 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
ITW vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITW drawdown since its inception was -54.90%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITW and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITW | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.90% | -36.97% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -29.60% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.63% | -34.06% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -34.06% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.85% | -34.06% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.22% | -29.78% | +14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -8.84% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 19.23% | -11.48% |
Volatility
ITW vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) is 3.43%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that ITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITW | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 8.66% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 16.47% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 25.63% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 20.15% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.81% | 21.06% | +2.75% |
Dividends
ITW vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
ITW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than KMB's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 2.51% | 2.53% | 2.29% | 2.07% | 2.30% | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 2.81% | 1.71% | 1.96% | 2.23% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.20% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
ITW vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illinois Tool Works Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ITW vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
ITW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
ITW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
ITW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a net income of 768.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITW and KMB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to ITW (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITW dropped -54.90% vs KMB's -36.97%.
ITW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITW and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer