PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITW vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ITW vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITW achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 31.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ITW has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 12.53%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.60% annualized return.


ITW

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6.90%
6M
5.23%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
12.53%

GWW

1D
-1.56%
1M
5.83%
YTD
31.38%
6M
29.47%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
25.77%
10Y*
21.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITW vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
6.90%-0.43%-0.97%21.56%-8.46%23.60%16.42%45.60%-22.10%38.92%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
31.38%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ITW and GWW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987

0.48

The correlation between ITW and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ITW:

$14.33

GWW:

$37.26

PE Ratio

ITW:

18.26

GWW:

35.44

PEG Ratio

ITW:

3.03

GWW:

2.05

PS Ratio

ITW:

3.53

GWW:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ITW:

$16.22B

GWW:

$18.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ITW:

$7.16B

GWW:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

ITW:

$4.61B

GWW:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITW vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITW
ITW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITW Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITW vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITWGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.13

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

4.36

-3.14

ITW vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITW Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITW and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITW vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITW drawdown since its inception was -54.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITW and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITWGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.90%

-56.73%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-13.35%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-24.50%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-24.50%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.85%

-41.60%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.12%

-3.29%

-8.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-11.00%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

6.51%

+1.63%

Volatility

ITW vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) is 5.34%, while W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that ITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITWGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.99%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.80%

18.09%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

25.04%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

24.73%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.80%

28.55%

-4.75%

Dividends

ITW vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

ITW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than GWW's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.70%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
2.42%2.53%2.29%2.07%2.30%1.91%2.17%2.30%2.81%1.71%1.96%2.23%

Financials

ITW vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illinois Tool Works Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20222023202420252026
4.02B
4.74B
(ITW) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ITW vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Illinois Tool Works Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%20222023202420252026
43.8%
40.0%
Portfolio components
ITW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

ITW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

ITW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a net income of 768.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ITW and GWW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWW has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to ITW (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITW dropped -54.90% vs GWW's -56.73%.

GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITW and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer