PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITW vs. ABT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ITW vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITW achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -26.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITW having a 11.44% annualized return and ABT not far behind at 11.01%.


ITW

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.02%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
11.44%

ABT

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.33%
YTD
-26.95%
6M
-25.03%
1Y
-30.87%
3Y*
-1.86%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITW vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
3.12%-0.43%-0.97%21.56%-8.46%23.60%16.42%45.60%-22.10%38.92%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-26.95%12.87%4.81%2.26%-20.68%30.53%28.04%22.08%29.06%52.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ITW and ABT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987

0.32

The correlation between ITW and ABT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ITW:

$14.33

ABT:

$3.59

PE Ratio

ITW:

17.61

ABT:

25.21

PEG Ratio

ITW:

2.92

ABT:

1.57

PS Ratio

ITW:

3.40

ABT:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

ITW:

$16.22B

ABT:

$45.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ITW:

$7.16B

ABT:

$25.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

ITW:

$4.61B

ABT:

$10.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITW vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITW
ITW Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITW vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITWABTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.77

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

-0.79

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

-1.79

+2.38

ITW vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITW Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of -1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITW and ABT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITWABTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

-1.27

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.08

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Drawdowns

ITW vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITW drawdown since its inception was -54.90%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITW and ABT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITWABTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.90%

-45.66%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-38.99%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.63%

-39.64%

+19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-39.64%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.85%

-39.64%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.22%

-33.84%

+18.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-10.83%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

17.23%

-9.48%

Volatility

ITW vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Illinois Tool Works Inc. (ITW) is 3.43%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that ITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITWABTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

8.41%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

19.45%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

24.42%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

22.04%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.81%

23.67%

+0.14%

Dividends

ITW vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

ITW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than ABT's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.70%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
ITW
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
2.51%2.53%2.29%2.07%2.30%1.91%2.17%2.30%2.81%1.71%1.96%2.23%

Financials

ITW vs. ABT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Illinois Tool Works Inc. and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
4.02B
11.16B
(ITW) Total Revenue
(ABT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ITW vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Illinois Tool Works Inc. and Abbott Laboratories over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
43.8%
56.3%
Portfolio components
ITW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 4.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.28B and revenue of 11.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.

ITW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

ITW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Illinois Tool Works Inc. reported a net income of 768.00M and revenue of 4.02B, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ITW and ABT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABT has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to ITW (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITW dropped -54.90% vs ABT's -45.66%.

ITW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITW and ABT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer