ITT vs. SLB
ITT (ITT Inc.) and SLB (Schlumberger Limited) are both stocks. ITT operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ITT returned 19.85%/yr vs -0.34%/yr for SLB. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ITT vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITT achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ITT has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 19.85%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.34% annualized return.
ITT
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 30.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.50%
- 10Y*
- 19.85%
SLB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- -0.34%
ITT vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITT ITT Inc. | 9.44% | 22.52% | 20.86% | 48.91% | -19.50% | 33.95% | 5.47% | 54.60% | -8.66% | 40.06% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.01% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITT and SLB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1995 | 0.39 |
The correlation between ITT and SLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ITT:
$5.58
SLB:
$3.04
ITT:
33.91
SLB:
18.45
ITT:
2.38
SLB:
0.87
ITT:
3.66
SLB:
1.70
ITT:
$4.24B
SLB:
$35.94B
ITT:
$1.50B
SLB:
$4.90B
ITT:
$793.20M
SLB:
$5.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITT vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
ITT
SLB
ITT vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ITT Inc. (ITT) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITT | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 4.36 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 10.97 | -7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITT vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITT drawdown since its inception was -74.46%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITT and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITT | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.46% | -87.64% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.73% | -14.30% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.09% | -46.63% | +17.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -46.63% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.52% | -84.29% | +34.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.51% | -33.53% | +19.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -31.18% | +12.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 5.67% | +0.87% |
Volatility
ITT vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ITT Inc. (ITT) is 9.01%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ITT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITT | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 9.50% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.19% | 25.72% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.02% | 33.73% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.22% | 37.63% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 40.41% | -8.49% |
Dividends
ITT vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
ITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SLB's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITT ITT Inc. | 0.78% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.30% | 0.86% | 0.88% | 0.80% | 1.11% | 0.96% | 1.29% | 1.30% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
ITT vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ITT Inc. and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ITT vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison
ITT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.80M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ITT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported an operating income of 141.20M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ITT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITT and SLB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ITT (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITT dropped -74.46% vs SLB's -87.64%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITT and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer