PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITT vs. LECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ITT vs. LECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ITT Inc. (ITT) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ITT having a 15.29% return and LECO slightly lower at 15.02%. Over the past 10 years, ITT has outperformed LECO with an annualized return of 21.05%, while LECO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.93% annualized return.


ITT

1D
1.23%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.29%
6M
12.81%
1Y
33.17%
3Y*
33.00%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
21.05%

LECO

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.30%
YTD
15.02%
6M
13.12%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITT vs. LECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITT
ITT Inc.
15.29%22.52%20.86%48.91%-19.50%33.95%5.47%54.60%-8.66%40.06%
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
15.02%29.63%-12.55%52.61%5.42%21.89%22.97%25.41%-12.24%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ITT and LECO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1995

0.50

The correlation between ITT and LECO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ITT:

$17.49B

LECO:

$15.20B

EPS

ITT:

$5.58

LECO:

$9.68

PE Ratio

ITT:

35.72

LECO:

28.38

PEG Ratio

ITT:

2.51

LECO:

1.23

PS Ratio

ITT:

3.86

LECO:

3.51

PB Ratio

ITT:

3.69

LECO:

10.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

ITT:

$4.24B

LECO:

$4.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ITT:

$1.50B

LECO:

$1.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

ITT:

$793.20M

LECO:

$807.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITT vs. LECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITT
ITT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

LECO
LECO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LECO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITT vs. LECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ITT Inc. (ITT) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITTLECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.92

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

4.97

-0.04

ITT vs. LECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the LECO Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITT and LECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITT vs. LECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITT drawdown since its inception was -74.46%, which is greater than LECO's maximum drawdown of -68.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITT and LECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITTLECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.46%

-68.89%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-20.09%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.09%

-34.29%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-34.29%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.52%

-38.89%

-10.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-7.78%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.95%

-13.51%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

7.74%

-1.00%

Volatility

ITT vs. LECO - Volatility Comparison

ITT Inc. (ITT) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) have volatilities of 9.11% and 8.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITTLECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

8.88%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.53%

20.50%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.38%

27.36%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

26.69%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.95%

27.48%

+4.47%

Dividends

ITT vs. LECO - Dividend Comparison

ITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than LECO's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITT
ITT Inc.
0.74%0.81%0.89%0.97%1.30%0.86%0.88%0.80%1.11%0.96%1.29%1.30%
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.12%1.27%1.54%1.21%1.61%1.50%1.70%1.96%2.08%1.57%1.71%2.29%

Financials

ITT vs. LECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ITT Inc. and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
1.12B
(ITT) Total Revenue
(LECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ITT vs. LECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ITT Inc. and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%20222023202420252026
35.4%
35.6%
Portfolio components
ITT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.80M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.

LECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 399.13M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

ITT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported an operating income of 141.20M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

LECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.16M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

ITT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

LECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 136.38M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ITT and LECO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITT has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to LECO (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITT dropped -74.46% vs LECO's -68.89%.

LECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITT and LECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer