ITRN vs. LNG
ITRN (Ituran Location and Control Ltd.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. ITRN operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ITRN returned 13.25%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for LNG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ITRN vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ITRN having a 35.25% return and LNG slightly lower at 33.71%. Over the past 10 years, ITRN has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 13.25%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.
ITRN
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- 6M
- 33.88%
- YTD
- 35.25%
- 1Y
- 51.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.37%
- 5Y*
- 21.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
LNG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 33.86%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
ITRN vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITRN Ituran Location and Control Ltd. | 35.25% | 45.63% | 21.02% | 32.47% | -18.79% | 45.32% | -22.93% | -18.98% | -3.46% | 33.71% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 33.71% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITRN and LNG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2005 | 0.18 |
The correlation between ITRN and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ITRN:
$1.11B
LNG:
$54.20B
ITRN:
$3.03
LNG:
$6.86
ITRN:
18.48
LNG:
37.72
ITRN:
1.17
LNG:
0.20
ITRN:
2.96
LNG:
2.74
ITRN:
5.35
LNG:
14.50
ITRN:
$375.23M
LNG:
$20.28B
ITRN:
$186.00M
LNG:
$5.52B
ITRN:
$99.51M
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITRN vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
ITRN
LNG
ITRN vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITRN | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 0.48 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 0.90 | +5.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITRN vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITRN drawdown since its inception was -68.39%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITRN and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITRN | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.39% | -97.84% | +29.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.99% | -24.09% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -24.87% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -24.87% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.39% | -57.53% | -10.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.96% | -12.69% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -43.08% | +23.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.16% | 12.88% | -4.72% |
Volatility
ITRN vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.89%. This indicates that ITRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITRN | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 7.89% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.12% | 22.45% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.94% | 27.34% | +5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 30.37% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 32.28% | +1.37% |
Dividends
ITRN vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
ITRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than LNG's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITRN Ituran Location and Control Ltd. | 5.36% | 4.65% | 5.01% | 2.50% | 2.65% | 3.37% | 1.26% | 3.78% | 2.96% | 3.27% | 3.25% | 4.12% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ITRN vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ituran Location and Control Ltd. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ITRN vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
ITRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. reported a gross profit of 49.44M and revenue of 102.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ITRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. reported an operating income of 22.06M and revenue of 102.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
ITRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. reported a net income of 16.77M and revenue of 102.67M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ITRN and LNG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITRN has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to LNG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITRN dropped -68.39% vs LNG's -97.84%.
ITRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITRN and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer