PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ITM vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ITM vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITM (VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITM returned 1.95%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for REMX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ITM charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

ITM vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 33.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ITM has underperformed REMX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.

ITM

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.95%

REMX

1D
-3.78%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
33.01%
6M
37.14%
1Y
172.35%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITM vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF		0.61%5.34%0.73%5.69%-9.33%0.21%5.87%8.46%0.96%6.13%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		33.01%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ITM and REMX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

-0.03

The correlation between ITM and REMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with ITM:
ITM vs. QTUMITM vs. MUSTITM vs. HYMBITM vs. VTEBITM vs. SCMBITM vs. MUBITM vs. FTABX
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

Return for Risk

ITM vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ITM
ITM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITM vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ITMREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.58
3.61

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.74
3.66

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.46

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

7.43

-5.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

21.32

-14.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ITM vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITM Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITM and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ITMREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.61

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.11

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.28

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.08

+0.51

Drawdowns

ITM vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and REMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ITMREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-90.20%

+65.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-23.35%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.68%

-62.11%

+56.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-73.34%

+58.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-73.34%

+48.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-54.98%

+53.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-66.87%

+63.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

8.12%

-7.05%

Volatility

ITM vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) is 1.01%, while VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that ITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ITMREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

13.02%

-12.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

34.77%

-32.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

48.11%

-45.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

40.24%

-35.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

36.94%

-29.84%

ITM vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITM vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than REMX's 1.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF		2.93%2.86%2.73%2.40%1.92%1.70%2.13%2.44%2.33%2.21%2.29%2.28%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		1.32%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

ITM and REMX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to ITM (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITM dropped -24.75% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 10.14% vs 1.95% for ITM. On fees, ITM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, ITM has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

ITM has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.32% for REMX.

ITM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while REMX is Materials. ITM tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous, while REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ITM and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITM and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer