ITEQ vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

ITEQ and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITEQ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2015. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	-0.86%	19.14%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEQ achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

ITEQ

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 7.94%
• 5Y*: -2.62%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

ITEQ

BlueStar Israel Technology ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

ITEQ vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEQ

ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITEQ	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITEQ	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.80	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between ITEQ and ARMH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

ITEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ARMH's 2.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF	0.85%	0.85%	0.01%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ITEQ vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEQ drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEQ and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITEQ	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.63%	-42.04%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.54%	-13.75%	-12.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-16.33%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ITEQ	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.59%	50.59%	-25.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.03%	50.59%	-25.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	50.59%	-27.32%