PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDH vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDH vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDH achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.64% return.


ITDH

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.82%
YTD
12.29%
6M
13.08%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDH vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
12.29%21.75%16.71%12.83%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDH and DGRO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.78

The correlation between ITDH and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITDH vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITDH
DGRO

Technology

26.8%
19.4%

Financial Services

16.1%
21.2%

Industrials

11.9%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
16.4%

Communication Services

8.1%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
11.5%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.5%

Energy

4.3%
5.6%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.6%
6.9%

Technology

ITDH
26.8%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

ITDH
16.1%
DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

ITDH
11.9%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ITDH
9.3%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

ITDH
8.3%
DGRO
16.4%

Communication Services

ITDH
8.1%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ITDH
4.8%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

ITDH
4.3%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

ITDH
4.3%
DGRO
5.6%

Real Estate

ITDH
3.5%
DGRO

-

Utilities

ITDH
2.6%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDH vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDH
ITDH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDH Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDH vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDHDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.71

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

14.33

-0.96

ITDH vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDH Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDH and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDHDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.53

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.75

0.77

+0.98

Drawdowns

ITDH vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDHDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-35.10%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-6.47%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-3.44%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.67%

+0.51%

Volatility

ITDH vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that ITDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDHDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

2.24%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

6.94%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

9.49%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

13.82%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

16.62%

-2.10%

ITDH vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITDH vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ITDH
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF
1.43%1.60%1.66%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITDH and DGRO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITDH has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, ITDH leads with 29.02% vs 23.89% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITDH has performed better with a 29.02% return vs 23.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDH.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.43% for ITDH.

ITDH is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDH and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDH and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer