ITA vs. IWN
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITA returned 15.34%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for IWN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.
Performance
ITA vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ITA has outperformed IWN with an annualized return of 15.34%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 42.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
ITA vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and IWN is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ITA and IWN has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ITA vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITA
IWN
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ITA
IWN
Technology
ITA
IWN
Basic Materials
ITA
-
IWN
Communication Services
ITA
-
IWN
Consumer Cyclical
ITA
-
IWN
Consumer Defensive
ITA
-
IWN
Energy
ITA
-
IWN
Financial Services
ITA
-
IWN
Healthcare
ITA
-
IWN
Real Estate
ITA
-
IWN
Utilities
ITA
-
IWN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
IWN
ITA vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITA | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.40 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 5.02 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 16.91 | -11.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITA vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, roughly equal to the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and IWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -61.55% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -8.45% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -26.70% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | -26.70% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | -46.08% | -4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | 0.00% | -6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -10.15% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 2.51% | +3.46% |
Volatility
ITA vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) at 5.80%. This indicates that ITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 5.80% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.47% | 12.25% | +6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 18.09% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 21.47% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 23.41% | -0.19% |
ITA vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IWN's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and IWN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to IWN (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs IWN's -61.55%.
On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 10.58% for IWN. On fees, IWN is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, IWN has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWN is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITA.
IWN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.24% for IWN.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITA and IWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer