ITA vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITA returned 16.86%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

ITA vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

ITA

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 3.58%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 27.30%
• 5Y*: 16.86%
• 10Y*: 15.34%

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITA vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF	8.97%	48.64%	15.81%	14.33%	9.96%	9.39%	-13.57%	-2.57%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ITA and FNGS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.38

ITA vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITA	FNGS
Industrials	99.8%	-
Technology	0.1%	59.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ITA vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITA

ITA Risk / Return Rank: 44
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITA vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITA	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.79	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.19	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.15	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	0.75	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	2.12	+3.08

ITA vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITA and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITA vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITA	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.72%	-48.98%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.82%	-22.93%	+7.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	-26.77%	+10.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	-48.98%	+30.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.64%	-9.63%	+2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.45%	-10.85%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	8.05%	-2.08%

Volatility

ITA vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) have volatilities of 9.07% and 8.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITA	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.07%	8.74%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.47%	17.19%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.74%	21.65%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	30.10%	-9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	31.17%	-7.95%

ITA vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITA vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.46%	0.55%	0.85%	0.93%	0.95%	0.82%	1.07%	1.54%	1.13%	0.91%	1.07%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITA and FNGS in my portfolio?

ITA and FNGS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITA or FNGS?

ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, ITA or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 16.86% for ITA. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITA or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITA or FNGS?

ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FNGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITA or FNGS?

ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between ITA and FNGS?

ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.