ISSC vs. LNG
ISSC (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. ISSC operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ISSC returned 22.38%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for LNG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ISSC vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISSC achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 33.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISSC having a 22.38% annualized return and LNG not far behind at 21.39%.
ISSC
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 37.51%
- 5Y*
- 23.51%
- 10Y*
- 22.38%
LNG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 33.86%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
ISSC vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISSC Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. | -0.48% | 121.78% | 0.12% | 3.77% | 25.32% | 0.61% | 29.83% | 158.41% | -23.13% | -11.71% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 33.71% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISSC and LNG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000 | 0.11 |
The correlation between ISSC and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ISSC:
$337.28M
LNG:
$54.20B
ISSC:
$0.94
LNG:
$6.86
ISSC:
20.10
LNG:
37.72
ISSC:
0.51
LNG:
0.20
ISSC:
3.78
LNG:
2.74
ISSC:
4.78
LNG:
14.50
ISSC:
$90.56M
LNG:
$20.28B
ISSC:
$44.22M
LNG:
$5.52B
ISSC:
$26.70M
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISSC vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
ISSC
LNG
ISSC vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 0.48 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 0.90 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISSC vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISSC drawdown since its inception was -89.03%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSC and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.03% | -97.84% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.83% | -24.09% | -33.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.83% | -24.87% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.83% | -24.87% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.41% | -57.53% | -4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.32% | -12.69% | -25.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.56% | -43.08% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.57% | 12.88% | +20.69% |
Volatility
ISSC vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.89%. This indicates that ISSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISSC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.85% | 7.89% | +10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.42% | 22.45% | +34.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.12% | 27.34% | +55.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.22% | 30.37% | +28.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.11% | 32.28% | +24.83% |
Dividends
ISSC vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
ISSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISSC Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 17.64% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Financials
ISSC vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ISSC vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
ISSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.43M and revenue of 22.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ISSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.94M and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
ISSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. reported a net income of 3.43M and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISSC and LNG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISSC has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to LNG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISSC dropped -89.03% vs LNG's -97.84%.
ISSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISSC and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer