ISRA vs. PCGG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while PCGG is actively managed. Over the past year, ISRA returned 41.95% vs -5.83% for PCGG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCGG.

Performance

ISRA vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -6.93% return.

ISRA

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 14.05%
• 6M: 17.88%
• 1Y: 41.95%
• 3Y*: 26.30%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

PCGG

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: -6.93%
• 6M: -6.74%
• 1Y: -5.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF	14.05%	36.98%	26.03%	2.95%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-6.93%	1.62%	12.40%	4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and PCGG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.61

The correlation between ISRA and PCGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISRA vs. PCGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISRA	PCGG
Financial Services	38.3%	17.5%
Technology	22.2%	40.1%
Healthcare	11.8%	13.0%
Industrials	10.5%	-
Utilities	5.0%	-
Real Estate	4.7%	2.0%
Energy	2.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	9.4%
Communication Services	1.8%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

ISRA vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA

ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 65
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 6
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISRA	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	-0.38	+2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	-0.43	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.95	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	-0.26	+4.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.53	-0.64	+15.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISRA vs. PCGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the PCGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and PCGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISRA	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	-0.38	+2.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.22	+0.24

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than PCGG's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and PCGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISRA	PCGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.02%	-22.66%	-22.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-22.66%	+11.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-11.59%	+6.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-4.95%	-6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	9.13%	-6.23%

Volatility

ISRA vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) at 3.80%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISRA	PCGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	3.80%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	12.06%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.84%	15.27%	+5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	16.64%	+5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	16.64%	+4.27%

ISRA vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISRA vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF	1.30%	1.48%	1.21%	1.89%	1.36%	1.28%	0.17%	1.38%	0.76%	1.58%	1.62%	1.31%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISRA and PCGG in my portfolio?

ISRA and PCGG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISRA or PCGG?

ISRA has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to PCGG (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs PCGG's -22.66%.

Which ETF is better, ISRA or PCGG?

On 1-year performance, ISRA leads with 41.95% vs -5.83% for PCGG. On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PCGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISRA or PCGG?

Over the 1-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 41.95% return vs -5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISRA or PCGG?

ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISRA or PCGG?

ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.

What is the main difference between ISRA and PCGG?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Polen. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.85% for PCGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.