ISRA vs. GDXJ
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISRA is a Global Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISRA returned 10.83%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 10.83%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.
ISRA
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
GDXJ
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.05% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 28.21% | 26.77% | -7.04% | 15.07% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -2.55% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and GDXJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013 | 0.19 |
The correlation between ISRA and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
GDXJ
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Technology
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Industrials
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Utilities
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Energy
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
ISRA
GDXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
GDXJ
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 1.99 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 4.95 | +9.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.32 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.30 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.06 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -88.66% | +43.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -32.92% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -32.92% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | -50.99% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | -57.77% | +12.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -29.01% | +24.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -60.50% | +49.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 13.19% | -10.29% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is 5.30%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that ISRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 16.66% | -11.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 41.34% | -26.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.84% | 49.79% | -28.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 41.10% | -19.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 44.06% | -23.15% |
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than GDXJ's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to ISRA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 13.07% vs 10.83% for ISRA. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, ISRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.30% for ISRA.
ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.52% for GDXJ.
ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer