PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPY.L vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISPY.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPY.L achieves a 42.50% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 29.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 18.22%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.42% annualized return.


ISPY.L

1D
0.80%
1M
37.62%
YTD
42.50%
6M
36.41%
1Y
40.87%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
18.22%

CIBR

1D
-2.55%
1M
32.49%
YTD
29.00%
6M
23.38%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
17.53%
10Y*
19.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
42.50%0.28%19.68%34.35%-24.57%9.18%37.24%25.65%14.46%13.10%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
29.00%5.01%20.28%32.73%-17.71%20.81%46.11%23.63%7.49%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPY.L and CIBR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015

0.65

The correlation between ISPY.L and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISPY.L
CIBR

Technology

97.2%
94.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.6%

Industrials

0.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ISPY.L
97.2%
CIBR
94.0%

Communication Services

ISPY.L
2.4%
CIBR
2.6%

Industrials

ISPY.L
0.4%
CIBR
3.5%

Basic Materials

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Energy

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Real Estate

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

ISPY.L

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPY.L vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPY.L
ISPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISPY.LCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.16

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

2.69

+2.43

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPY.L and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISPY.LCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.10

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.74

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.83

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.74

+0.01

Drawdowns

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPY.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY.L and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPY.LCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.77%

-29.51%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.33%

-23.16%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-23.16%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-26.31%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.77%

-29.51%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.55%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-7.33%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

9.94%

-1.98%

Volatility

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) is 10.15%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that ISPY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPY.LCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.15%

10.84%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.07%

20.82%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.30%

24.43%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

23.93%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

23.38%

-0.84%

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPY.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
ISPY.L
L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPY.L and CIBR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.

ISPY.L is categorized as Cybersecurity, while CIBR is Technology Equities. ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ISPY.L and 0.60% for CIBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPY.L and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer