ISPY.L vs. CIBR
ISPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISPY.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L returned 18.22%/yr vs 19.42%/yr for CIBR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISPY.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISPY.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISPY.L achieves a 42.50% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 29.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPY.L has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 18.22%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.42% annualized return.
ISPY.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 37.62%
- YTD
- 42.50%
- 6M
- 36.41%
- 1Y
- 40.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.22%
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 32.49%
- YTD
- 29.00%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 26.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.42%
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 42.50% | 0.28% | 19.68% | 34.35% | -24.57% | 9.18% | 37.24% | 25.65% | 14.46% | 13.10% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 29.00% | 5.01% | 20.28% | 32.73% | -17.71% | 20.81% | 46.11% | 23.63% | 7.49% | 8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISPY.L and CIBR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ISPY.L and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISPY.L
CIBR
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ISPY.L
CIBR
Communication Services
ISPY.L
CIBR
Industrials
ISPY.L
CIBR
Basic Materials
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Energy
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Financial Services
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Healthcare
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Real Estate
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Utilities
ISPY.L
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISPY.L vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
ISPY.L
CIBR
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISPY.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.16 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 2.69 | +2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISPY.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.10 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.74 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.74 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISPY.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY.L and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISPY.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -29.51% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.33% | -23.16% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -23.16% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -26.31% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.77% | -29.51% | -2.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.55% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -7.33% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 9.94% | -1.98% |
Volatility
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) is 10.15%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that ISPY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISPY.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 10.84% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 20.82% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.30% | 24.43% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 23.93% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 23.38% | -0.84% |
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISPY.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISPY.L vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISPY.L and CIBR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.
ISPY.L is categorized as Cybersecurity, while CIBR is Technology Equities. ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ISPY.L and 0.60% for CIBR.
Find the right allocation for ISPY.L and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer