ISHP vs. XRT
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs -0.84%/yr for XRT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
ISHP vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's -1.99% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
XRT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
ISHP vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -10.97% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -1.99% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and XRT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ISHP and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISHP vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
XRT
Communication Services
ISHP
XRT
Industrials
ISHP
XRT
-
Technology
ISHP
XRT
Real Estate
ISHP
XRT
-
Healthcare
ISHP
XRT
Financial Services
ISHP
XRT
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
XRT
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
XRT
-
Energy
ISHP
-
XRT
Utilities
ISHP
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
XRT
ISHP vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 0.42 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | 0.76 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.63 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 1.45 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.42 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.03 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.35 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -65.81% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -13.53% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -25.62% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -44.57% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -13.82% | -4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -15.00% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 5.85% | +5.54% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 3.98%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 6.50% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 13.63% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 20.42% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 26.90% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 27.16% | -3.07% |
ISHP vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than XRT's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and XRT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 1.58% vs -0.84% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 1.58% return vs -0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.83% for XRT.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer