ISHP vs. RTH
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for RTH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
ISHP vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 1.52% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
RTH
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
ISHP vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -10.97% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.52% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and RTH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ISHP and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
RTH
Communication Services
ISHP
RTH
-
Industrials
ISHP
RTH
Technology
ISHP
RTH
-
Real Estate
ISHP
RTH
-
Healthcare
ISHP
RTH
Financial Services
ISHP
RTH
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
RTH
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
RTH
-
Energy
ISHP
-
RTH
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
RTH
ISHP vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 0.67 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | 1.08 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.13 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 3.98 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.67 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.56 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.50 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -42.32% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -7.83% | -16.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -13.80% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -25.00% | -22.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -6.18% | -12.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -7.34% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 2.23% | +9.16% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.80% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 9.22% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 12.09% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 16.80% | +10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 17.54% | +6.55% |
ISHP vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than RTH's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and RTH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISHP has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to RTH (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 5-year performance, RTH leads with 9.32% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RTH has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.96% for RTH.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer