ISHP vs. CARZ
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from First Trust - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 2.04%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for CARZ. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CARZ.
Performance
ISHP vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 31.11% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
CARZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 66.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $535.60K | $505.64K | $494.01K | |
| $7.11K | $5.31K | $3.27K |
ISHP vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -8.73% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 31.11% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 54.66% | 11.39% | -23.91% | 25.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and CARZ is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ISHP and CARZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
CARZ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
CARZ
Communication Services
ISHP
CARZ
Industrials
ISHP
CARZ
Technology
ISHP
CARZ
Real Estate
ISHP
CARZ
-
Financial Services
ISHP
CARZ
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
CARZ
-
Healthcare
ISHP
CARZ
-
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
CARZ
Energy
ISHP
-
CARZ
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
CARZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
CARZ
ISHP vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 2.98 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 10.94 | -11.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum CARZ drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and CARZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -51.20% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -21.44% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -27.84% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -40.30% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.15% | -17.07% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -12.87% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | 5.83% | +8.06% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.32%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 12.06% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 27.80% | -13.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 31.88% | -13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 29.28% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 26.77% | -2.74% |
ISHP vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CARZ's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.34% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and CARZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to ISHP (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs CARZ's -51.20%.
On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 12.78% vs 2.04% for ISHP. On fees, ISHP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISHP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.14% for ISHP.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and CARZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer