PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISHP vs. CARZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISHP vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 31.11% return.


ISHP

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.54%
6M
-7.70%
YTD
-8.73%
1Y
-8.31%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.29%

CARZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
-7.17%
6M
20.80%
YTD
31.11%
1Y
66.56%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
14.32%
ALL TIME*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$535.60K$505.64K$494.01K
$7.11K$5.31K$3.27K

ISHP vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
-8.73%12.27%24.17%22.24%-33.79%30.09%15.33%19.74%-2.04%7.66%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
31.11%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%54.66%11.39%-23.91%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ISHP and CARZ is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.52

The correlation between ISHP and CARZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISHP vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISHP
CARZ

Consumer Cyclical

25.8%
16.3%

Communication Services

15.2%
4.1%

Industrials

7.6%
6.4%

Technology

7.6%
69.1%

Real Estate

4.5%

-

Financial Services

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Healthcare

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISHP
25.8%
CARZ
16.3%

Communication Services

ISHP
15.2%
CARZ
4.1%

Industrials

ISHP
7.6%
CARZ
6.4%

Technology

ISHP
7.6%
CARZ
69.1%

Real Estate

ISHP
4.5%
CARZ

-

Financial Services

ISHP
3.0%
CARZ

-

Consumer Defensive

ISHP
1.5%
CARZ

-

Healthcare

ISHP
1.5%
CARZ

-

Basic Materials

ISHP

-

CARZ
4.2%

Energy

ISHP

-

CARZ

-

Utilities

ISHP

-

CARZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISHP vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISHP
ISHP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ISHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISHP vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISHPCARZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.34

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

2.98

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

10.94

-11.64

ISHP vs. CARZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISHP Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the CARZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISHP and CARZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISHP vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum CARZ drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and CARZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISHPCARZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-51.20%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.75%

-21.44%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-27.84%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.57%

-40.30%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.15%

-17.07%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-12.87%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.89%

5.83%

+8.06%

Volatility

ISHP vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.32%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISHPCARZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

12.06%

-6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

27.80%

-13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

31.88%

-13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.32%

29.28%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

26.77%

-2.74%

ISHP vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISHP vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison

ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than CARZ's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.34%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
1.14%1.34%1.02%1.58%0.76%0.53%0.82%1.16%0.89%1.65%0.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISHP and CARZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to ISHP (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs CARZ's -51.20%.

On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 12.78% vs 2.04% for ISHP. On fees, ISHP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISHP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.14% for ISHP.

ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISHP and CARZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer