ISHP vs. BNO
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ISHP is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs 23.77%/yr for BNO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.
Performance
ISHP vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- 86.76%
- 6M
- 83.45%
- 1Y
- 89.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 23.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
ISHP vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -10.97% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 86.76% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and BNO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016 | 0.12 |
The correlation between ISHP and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
BNO
ISHP vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 2.17 | -2.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | 2.68 | -3.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 5.39 | -5.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 10.23 | -10.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.17 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.68 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.14 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -87.06% | +39.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -17.87% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -23.75% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -33.70% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -12.04% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -40.18% | +27.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 9.43% | +1.96% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 3.98%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 15.03% | -11.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 36.08% | -22.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 41.56% | -24.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 35.37% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 36.68% | -12.59% |
ISHP vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and BNO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 23.77% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, ISHP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 23.77% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISHP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.90% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer