ISCG vs. GRPZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) and GRPZ (Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - ISCG tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index while GRPZ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISCG returned 26.61% vs 30.97% for GRPZ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPZ.

Performance

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCG achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than GRPZ's 23.85% return.

ISCG

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 7.00%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 26.61%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

GRPZ

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 7.28%
• 6M: 16.11%
• YTD: 23.85%
• 1Y: 30.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF	14.58%	12.88%	8.83%
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	23.85%	3.09%	4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCG and GRPZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.84

The correlation between ISCG and GRPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISCG	GRPZ
Industrials	23.2%	16.1%
Technology	22.6%	7.6%
Healthcare	17.9%	15.8%
Financial Services	9.3%	28.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	11.8%
Real Estate	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	2.3%
Energy	3.2%	12.2%
Communication Services	2.9%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	5.3%
Utilities	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

ISCG vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCG

ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 54
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

GRPZ

GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISCG	GRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.77	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.70	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.27	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.77	9.39	-0.61

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the GRPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCG and GRPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than GRPZ's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and GRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCG	GRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.72%	-27.87%	-29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-9.53%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	0.00%	-3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.58%	-6.68%	-4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.31%	-0.27%

Volatility

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) at 3.78%. This indicates that ISCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCG	GRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	3.78%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	11.77%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	17.53%	+0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.00%	20.87%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.13%	20.87%	+2.26%

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCG vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison

ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than GRPZ's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	0.87%	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF	0.59%	0.61%	0.84%	0.77%	0.92%	0.62%	0.10%	0.27%	0.40%	0.52%	1.19%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCG and GRPZ in my portfolio?

ISCG and GRPZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCG or GRPZ?

ISCG has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to GRPZ (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs GRPZ's -27.87%.

Which ETF is better, ISCG or GRPZ?

On 1-year performance, GRPZ leads with 30.97% vs 26.61% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GRPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCG or GRPZ?

Over the 1-year period, GRPZ has performed better with a 30.97% return vs 26.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCG or GRPZ?

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCG or GRPZ?

GRPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.59% for ISCG.

What is the main difference between ISCG and GRPZ?

ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.35% for GRPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.