PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCG vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCG vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISCG having a 12.92% return and BKSE slightly higher at 13.03%.


ISCG

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.92%
6M
12.57%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
11.37%

BKSE

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.60%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.11%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCG vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.92%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%71.39%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
13.03%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%55.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCG and BKSE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.93

The correlation between ISCG and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCG vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCG
BKSE

Industrials

24.6%
15.4%

Technology

21.4%
16.8%

Healthcare

15.4%
11.4%

Financial Services

10.6%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
13.3%

Real Estate

5.2%
6.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.2%

Energy

2.8%
7.0%

Utilities

1.0%
3.4%

Industrials

ISCG
24.6%
BKSE
15.4%

Technology

ISCG
21.4%
BKSE
16.8%

Healthcare

ISCG
15.4%
BKSE
11.4%

Financial Services

ISCG
10.6%
BKSE
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCG
9.9%
BKSE
13.3%

Real Estate

ISCG
5.2%
BKSE
6.6%

Basic Materials

ISCG
3.5%
BKSE
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

ISCG
2.9%
BKSE
3.2%

Communication Services

ISCG
2.8%
BKSE
2.2%

Energy

ISCG
2.8%
BKSE
7.0%

Utilities

ISCG
1.0%
BKSE
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCG vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCG vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCGBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.49

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

12.15

-1.85

ISCG vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCG and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCGBKSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.87

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.32

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.73

-0.32

Drawdowns

ISCG vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCG drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCG and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-29.08%

-28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-9.40%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-26.76%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.80%

-29.08%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.11%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-9.06%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.69%

+0.29%

Volatility

ISCG vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.47%. This indicates that ISCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.47%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

11.96%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

17.63%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

21.43%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

22.30%

+0.86%

ISCG vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCG vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than BKSE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ISCG and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISCG has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCG dropped -57.72% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 6.89% vs 5.31% for ISCG. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 6.89% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCG.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.56% for ISCG.

ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISCG and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCG and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer