PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCB vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCB vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 9.30%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCB vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
11.43%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCB and DGRO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.81

The correlation between ISCB and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCB vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCB
DGRO

Industrials

18.5%
10.8%

Financial Services

15.9%
21.2%

Technology

14.6%
19.4%

Healthcare

13.3%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
5.7%

Real Estate

8.2%

-

Energy

4.9%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
11.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
0.1%

Utilities

2.3%
6.9%

Industrials

ISCB
18.5%
DGRO
10.8%

Financial Services

ISCB
15.9%
DGRO
21.2%

Technology

ISCB
14.6%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

ISCB
13.3%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCB
11.8%
DGRO
5.7%

Real Estate

ISCB
8.2%
DGRO

-

Energy

ISCB
4.9%
DGRO
5.6%

Basic Materials

ISCB
4.6%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

ISCB
3.4%
DGRO
11.5%

Communication Services

ISCB
2.6%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

ISCB
2.3%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCB vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCB vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCBDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.50

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

13.52

-2.27

ISCB vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCB and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCBDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.39

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.77

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.76

-0.39

Drawdowns

ISCB vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCBDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-35.10%

-26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-6.47%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

-14.03%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-19.31%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

-35.10%

-9.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.28%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-3.44%

-6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.67%

+0.96%

Volatility

ISCB vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that ISCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCBDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.21%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

6.91%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

9.48%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

13.82%

+7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.68%

16.62%

+6.06%

ISCB vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCB vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCB and DGRO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCB has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 9.30% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.27% for ISCB.

ISCB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCB and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer