PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRCPX vs. IRLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRCPX achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IRCPX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 4.23%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.


IRCPX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.26%
6M
2.26%
YTD
2.94%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
4.79%

IRLNX

1D
2.15%
1M
-0.51%
6M
5.90%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
18.08%
ALL TIME*
17.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRCPX
Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio
2.94%9.54%5.85%9.09%-13.69%4.87%10.77%13.81%-4.66%7.82%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
2.58%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IRCPX and IRLNX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009

0.70

The correlation between IRCPX and IRLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRCPX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IRCPX
IRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRCPXIRLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

0.74

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

2.09

+7.08

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRCPX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRCPX drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum IRLNX drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCPX and IRLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRCPXIRLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-32.90%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.54%

-16.64%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.50%

-23.31%

+18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-32.90%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.75%

-32.90%

+15.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-6.57%

+5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-4.75%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

5.66%

-4.83%

Volatility

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio (IRCPX) is 1.70%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that IRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRCPXIRLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

7.04%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

14.93%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.86%

18.58%

-13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

22.36%

-16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

21.62%

-15.78%

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRCPX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRCPX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

IRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.57%, less than IRLNX's 20.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRCPX
Voya Retirement Conservative Portfolio
10.57%17.17%4.99%4.01%13.97%4.50%4.29%4.59%2.93%3.78%3.95%5.67%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
20.13%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRCPX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRLNX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to IRCPX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCPX dropped -17.75% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

IRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRCPX and IRLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer